‘G.I.
JOE: RETALIATION’ REVIEW
BY
IAN TAN
G.I. Joe: Retaliation marks director Jon M.
Chu’s (Step Up 3D, Never Say Never) first foray into the action movie genre. It
also serves as a kick-starter to this year’s serving of blockbuster action
movies. So, how well does G.I. Joe: Retaliation fare as the first of many
action flicks to hit the silver screen in 2013? The answer may vary for
different audience members, but I for one, found this second adventure of the Hasbro-boy-dolls-turned-movie
franchise installment to be a pretty fun trip to the cinema.
The movie starts off a few months after the
events of its predecessor, ‘G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra’, and sees Duke leading
a whole new team of Joes to get business done. Soon enough, the bad guys emerge,
kill pretty much the whole G.I. Joe gang save Roadblock (Dwayne Johnson), Lady
Jaye (Adrianne Palicki) and Flint (DJ Cotrona) and plans are revealed as to how
the villain, Cobra Commander, aims to strike nuclear war in order to rule the
world yada yada yada… and the adventure begins for Roadblock (Dwayne Johnson)
and what’s left of the Joes to stop Cobra Commander’s ever-so-typical quest to
gain “it all”. The plot is hardly the stuff of great screenwriting, not that we
expect it coming from a G.I. Joe movie anyways, but in terms of action
sequences and a sense of fun, the movie does pretty well.
This time round, Dwayne Johnson leads
the cast alongside Adrianne Palicki, DJ Cotrona and Bruce Willis, amongst
others. Returning cast members include Byung-hun Lee, Ray Park, and a brief
Channing Tatum. The new cast of actors, surprisingly, deliver their roles quite
well and are definitely a step above the previous installment’s cast, bringing
in more believability to their roles as Government Issue material rather than
being mere good looking soldiers whose action sequences looked like they were
performed by stuntmen. I can’t really tell, though, if Bruce Willis was
actually having fun during the shoot of this movie or if he was simply
slacking, as his performance in this film seems oddly forgettable and does not
live up to the rank and stature the character was meant to be.
There are several things this film bests its
predecessor at, and some it doesn’t. The action sequences for one, take on a
less corny and cooler approach. Gone are the goofy rip-off Iron Man-wannabe
suits, over-the-top and ever-so-CGI looking action sequences and in are the uber-cool
ninja sword slinging, acrobatics, and good old gunfire action. Be sure to look
out for the mountain swordfight featuring Snake Eyes and Jinx against Storm
Shadow’s minions. That scene alone makes the added price for 3D worth it,
especially when experienced in full IMAX 3D. The visual effects in this film
are used to greater benefit by treating us to tech such as miniscule
insect-sized spy bombs and motorbikes that split into multiple boosters. This
definitely outdoes ‘Rise of Cobra’ in terms of the use of digital special
effects, as the previous movie contained too many gizmos, ships and
environments that felt too gadgetry and sci-fi for a G.I. Joe film. It’s nice
to see how ‘Retaliation’ strikes a pretty good balance between high-tech tools,
ninja swordfights and combat, as well as shootouts to provide a more G.I. Joe
feel that is more faithful to the comics and TV show.
Although a number of supporting characters get
little in terms of development, director Jon Chu does a pretty okay job at the
characterizations of the more major characters (Roadblock, Lady Jaye, Storm
Shadow and Snake Eyes), presenting them in a way I believe fans would be
(somewhat) pleased with. The sense of urgency and teamwork are also more
apparent and better done here than in ‘Rise of Cobra’, with fewer and probably
more interesting/likable characters (that’s debatable) to follow and a simpler
storyline that doesn’t try to be something more complex or convoluted than it
should be as its first film did, which is a plus point of sorts.
One thing to note about ‘Retaliation’ is that
it feels awfully disconnected from the first film. Aside from the Snake Eyes/
Storm shadow story and the president of the United States being impersonated,
there is very little in this second venture into the G.I. Joe cinematic world
that relates to the first movie. Duke’s relationship with his other buddies
that don’t make a return in this film (Anna/Baroness, Rip Cord, Heavy Duty,
Scarlett, and General Hawk) are not referenced at all, with the biggest plot
thread of Duke’s continuing relationship with Anna/Baroness completely
forgotten, which is a pity as it would have given more emotional impact to the
character when the unfortunate happens ;). There’s also RZA who plays Snake
Eyes’ master who seemed completely miscast. It almost felt like a joke. And
certain action sequences do play out better than others in this movie. Some are
very, very well choreographed while others seem quite shaky and distorting,
most notably the shootout scenes with multiple rounds of bullets fired to
who-knows-where. But then again, it’s forgivable considering the fact that this
is the director’s first action movie.
Aside some of the typical flaws most action
(or should I say Hasbro?) movies suffer from, ‘G.I. Joe: Retaliation’ more
often treats audiences with a fun-filled action extravaganza (as most Hasbro
movies have) and an entertaining performance by leading man Dwayne Johnson
(he’s dominating the entire action scene now, isn’t he?), who is basically the
backbone of the movie and is probably the reason why this movie would fare well
with most audiences. It’s definitely not a must-see action movie, but it does
its job as a pleasing appetizer for us audiences craving for more action movies
lined up this year. Next up, ‘Iron Man 3’…
6.7 out of 10 stars
No comments:
Post a Comment